June 21, 2015

The Sasquatch Genome Project

Our guest Dr. Melba S. Ketchum has made a DNA analysis of possible Bigfoot hair samples, which was leaked to the public before the publication of her peer-reviewed paper. She is a part of the Sasquatch Genome Project and will tell us what they have discovered so far. Plus, we welcome a renowned filmmaker, author and scholar to discuss the work of Stanley Kubrick.

Episode Segments:

The Conspiracy Show: Sasquatch Genome Project Richard and Guest Host Richard Astey welcome Dr. Melba S. Ketchum, who is a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine and the President and Director of DNA Diagnostics, Inc., a genetics laboratory geared to state of the art genetic testing to talk about their research on Bigfoot.
Embed Code
The Conspiracy Show: Kubrick's Odyssey Jay Weidner is the writer/director of a insightful film which is the first in a series of documentaries that will reveal the secret knowledge embedded in the work of the greatest filmmaker of all time: Stanley Kubrick. This famed movie director who made films such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut, placed symbols and hidden anecdotes into his films that tell a far different story than the films appeared to be saying.In Kubrick's Odyssey, Part I, Kubrick and Apollo, author and filmmaker, Jay Weidner presents compelling evidence of how Stanley Kubrick directed the Apollo moon landings. He reveals that the film, 2001: A Space Odyssey was not only a retelling of Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick's novel, but also a research and development project that assisted Kubrick in the creation of the Apollo moon footage. In light of this revelation, Weidner also explores Kubrick's film, The Shining and shows that this film is, in actuality, the story of Kubrick's personal travails as he secretly worked on the Apollo footage for NASA.
Embed Code

Links to Related Websites:

The Sasquatch Genome Project It has been a long and tedious battle to prove that Sasquatch exists. We have had the proof for 8 years now, but building enough data to convince mainstream science has taken a lot of time. Trying to publish took almost two years. It seems mainstream science just can’t seem to tolerate something controversial, especially from a group of primarily forensic scientists and not “famous academians” aligned with large universities, even though most of our sequencing and analysis was performed at just such facilities.